Top stories






RetailCEM Africa Summit 2025: Leading the future of customer experience with AI innovation
CEM Africa 2 days
More news








Marketing & Media
#Cannes2025: The Glass Lion for Change shortlist revealed
Danette Breitenbach 5 Jun 2025









For legal and business teams dealing with time-sensitive risks, these changes provide clearer pathways, and call for greater clarity, planning, and procedural rigour.
Under the amended Rule 41A of the High Court Rules, all new actions and applications must include a notice stating whether the parties agree to explore mediation. However, this requirement can now be waived in urgent cases. The court is permitted to dispense with the mediation-notice obligation for both the applicant and respondent, provided urgency is properly motivated.
This adjustment recognises that where rights are at immediate risk, procedural flexibility is necessary. That said, urgency must be clearly explained in the founding papers, not just asserted. The court's discretion must be actively and responsibly invoked.
Rule 55(3)(b) of the Magistrates’ Court Rules now allows ex parte applications to be treated as urgent, provided they meet specific requirements. Applicants must identify the grounds for urgency (such as irreparable harm or prejudice), reference any relevant statutory provisions, and support their case with affidavit evidence.
The rules also allow such matters to be brought before a magistrate in chambers. This creates room for faster relief in appropriate cases but also places more responsibility on practitioners to present clear, compliant applications from the outset.
These updates invite a more deliberate approach to urgent litigation. While the procedural barriers are now more defined, the room for error has narrowed. Well-prepared applications are likely to receive prompt attention, while rushed or incomplete filings may face resistance, delays, or dismissal.
The amendments to Rule 41A and Rule 55(3)(b) reflect a broader trend toward modernising urgent relief procedures. They also underscore the importance of preparation and clarity in litigation strategy. When time is short, strong process discipline becomes a form of advocacy in itself.
As the courts tighten expectations and expand discretion, the most effective applications will be those that combine substance with structure: timely, thoughtful, and grounded in both legal and practical realities.